From owner-freebsd-current  Fri Feb 26 13:21:38 1999
Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Received: from freebsd.dk (freebsd.dk [212.242.42.178])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2E56F1508B
	for <freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG>; Fri, 26 Feb 1999 13:21:34 -0800 (PST)
	(envelope-from sos@freebsd.dk)
Received: (from sos@localhost)
	by freebsd.dk (8.9.1/8.9.1) id WAA73269;
	Fri, 26 Feb 1999 22:20:24 +0100 (CET)
	(envelope-from sos)
From: Søren Schmidt <sos@freebsd.dk>
Message-Id: <199902262120.WAA73269@freebsd.dk>
Subject: Re: IDE CDROM not found with PIIX4 chipset, -current kernel
In-Reply-To: <36D704E8.B6E97A0D@newsguy.com> from "Daniel C. Sobral" at "Feb 27, 1999  5:32:40 am"
To: dcs@newsguy.com (Daniel C. Sobral)
Date: Fri, 26 Feb 1999 22:20:24 +0100 (CET)
Cc: sheldonh@iafrica.com, beyssac@enst.fr, grog@lemis.com,
	freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL43 (25)]
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG

It seems Daniel C. Sobral wrote:
> "Søren Schmidt" wrote:
> > 
> > > The problem is the ARS_BSY signal. If my memory doesn't fail me, if
> > > ARS_BSY is active, then the other signals may contain trash. In this
> > > particular loop, ARS_BSY could be active, but it wasn't being
> > > checked for, on the assumption that ARS_DRQ would only be up (down?)
> > > when the operation completed.
> > 
> > This has been in there for ages, if the PR is still open it should
> > be closed.
> 
> It is closed. We were discussing (actually, I was wondering) whether
> it might have resurfaced with acd.

Nope, that code snippet is in atapi.c its not in any of the drivers...
(and newer has been).

-Søren


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message