Date: Wed, 24 Sep 2003 12:43:54 +1000 From: John Birrell <jb@cimlogic.com.au> To: Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org> Cc: current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Initial list of ports that fail due to -pthread Message-ID: <20030924024354.GA44314@freebsd1.cimlogic.com.au> In-Reply-To: <20030924023343.GA55583@rot13.obsecurity.org> References: <20030924021820.GA55388@rot13.obsecurity.org> <20030924023205.GK34649@freebsd1.cimlogic.com.au> <20030924023343.GA55583@rot13.obsecurity.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, Sep 23, 2003 at 07:33:43PM -0700, Kris Kennaway wrote:
> Won't these ports still need to be fixed to look at
> PTHREAD_{LIBS,CFLAGS} though, since the correct values for 4.x and 5.x
> will still be different?
Not if -pthread remains. Internally gcc would link to a different
library, but most ports won't see that.
--
John Birrell
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20030924024354.GA44314>