From owner-freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Sep 13 06:32:02 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5B01FE97 for ; Sat, 13 Sep 2014 06:32:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::16:76]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4167C221 for ; Sat, 13 Sep 2014 06:32:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: from bugs.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.118]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.14.9/8.14.9) with ESMTP id s8D6W2KH082403 for ; Sat, 13 Sep 2014 06:32:02 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 193595] bsdinstall should enable UEFI booting if booted from UEFI Date: Sat, 13 Sep 2014 06:32:02 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: bin X-Bugzilla-Version: 10.1-BETA1 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Many People X-Bugzilla-Who: nwhitehorn@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Status: In Discussion X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_status Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Bug reports List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 13 Sep 2014 06:32:02 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193595 Nathan Whitehorn changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|Needs Triage |In Discussion --- Comment #7 from Nathan Whitehorn --- That makes sense. Most UEFI systems do at least allow CSM booting, so just banning it is indeed not the right choice. I'll try to get that in tomorrow. Longer term, what we really need is ZFS support in the UEFI bootblocks (ideally, we could also use the same bootblocks for BIOS for UFS and ZFS, but maybe that's a pipe dream). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.