Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Thu, 10 May 2018 21:22:27 +0000
From:      bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org
To:        bugs@FreeBSD.org
Subject:   [Bug 192487] cpucontrol uses unsafe procedure to detect current microcode version
Message-ID:  <bug-192487-227-mQPD0zU79N@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-192487-227@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
References:  <bug-192487-227@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D192487

--- Comment #8 from Stefan B. <sblachmann@gmail.com> ---
Ed, this would be great.

May I point you at another issue: in the current implementation, the
eval_cpu_features system call output from cpuctl.ko goes to the console,
spamming a half screenful of information - for each and every core again. T=
his
can be a *lot* of dmesg spam.

I would be willing to address this too when merging-in Dan's suggested chan=
ges.

Warner suggested that cpupdate being put on phabricator, but I haven't heard
from him for a while. He seems very busy and told me that my initial reply =
got
into his spam folder somehow. Could you maybe cc him and ask him whether he=
 got
my email from April 24th?

What about putting cpupdate, the updated cpuctl and cpucontrol on phabricat=
or
then, so these can be reviewed together?

--=20
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.=



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bug-192487-227-mQPD0zU79N>