From owner-freebsd-current  Tue May  4 11:20:25 1999
Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Received: from apollo.backplane.com (apollo.backplane.com [209.157.86.2])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 520F714D63
	for <freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG>; Tue,  4 May 1999 11:20:23 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from dillon@apollo.backplane.com)
Received: (from dillon@localhost)
	by apollo.backplane.com (8.9.3/8.9.1) id LAA14749;
	Tue, 4 May 1999 11:19:40 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from dillon)
Date: Tue, 4 May 1999 11:19:40 -0700 (PDT)
From: Matthew Dillon <dillon@apollo.backplane.com>
Message-Id: <199905041819.LAA14749@apollo.backplane.com>
To: Dmitry Khrustalev <dima@zippy.machaon.ru>
Cc: Warner Losh <imp@harmony.village.org>,
	John Polstra <jdp@polstra.com>, ben@rosengart.com,
	freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject: Re: Any action on PR 10570 ? getting closer to 65K :-( 
References:  <Pine.BSF.4.05.9905041745510.39879-100000@zippy.machaon.ru>
Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG

    I think the worst case you might see is on the order of 50,000 or so
    route entries.  If we give FreeBSD the capability to handle multipath
    routes, it would depend on the size of the mesh but I can't imagine 
    there would be more then a few hundred thousand route entries in the 
    route table.  It take a phenominally stupid network setup to create more
    then that.

    The number would not be effected much (if at all) IPV4 verses IPV6.

					-Matt
					Matthew Dillon 
					<dillon@backplane.com>


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message