From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Feb 26 19:29:52 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0804E1065681; Tue, 26 Feb 2008 19:29:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kris@FreeBSD.org) Received: from weak.local (freefall.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::28]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1F68713C4E5; Tue, 26 Feb 2008 19:29:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kris@FreeBSD.org) Message-ID: <47C468AE.7060603@FreeBSD.org> Date: Tue, 26 Feb 2008 20:29:50 +0100 From: Kris Kennaway User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.9 (Macintosh/20071031) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Julian Elischer References: <47C39948.3080907@elischer.org> <20080226051346.GA65258@lor.one-eyed-alien.net> <47C458E9.5090400@freebsd.org> <47C45CFE.9030006@elischer.org> In-Reply-To: <47C45CFE.9030006@elischer.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Brooks Davis , Andre Oppermann , FreeBSD Current , Marko Zec , Marko Zec , Marko Zec Subject: Re: warning of pending commit attempt. X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 26 Feb 2008 19:29:52 -0000 Julian Elischer wrote: > Andre Oppermann wrote: >> Brooks Davis wrote: >>> On Mon, Feb 25, 2008 at 08:44:56PM -0800, Julian Elischer wrote: >>> >>>> At some stage in the next few weeks I will be trying to commit >>>> Marco Zec's vimage code to -current. (only 'trying' not >>>> for technical reasons, but political). >> ... >>>> Why now? >>>> The code is in a shape where teh compiled out version of hte system >>>> is stable. In the compiled in version, it is functional >>>> enough to provide nearly all of what people want. It needs people >>>> with other interests to adapt it to their purposes and use it so >>>> that it can become a solid product for future releases. >>> >>> The website has a snapshot with a date over a month old and many >>> comments about unstable interfaces. I've seen zero reports of >>> substantial testing... >> >> What about locking and SMP scalability? Any new choke points? > > not that I've seen. That's a less than resounding endorsement :) Kris