From owner-freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jul 26 04:10:16 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-bugs@hub.freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-bugs@hub.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0597A16A41F for ; Tue, 26 Jul 2005 04:10:16 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [216.136.204.21]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C327C43D45 for ; Tue, 26 Jul 2005 04:10:15 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (gnats@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.13.3/8.13.3) with ESMTP id j6Q4AFCo019746 for ; Tue, 26 Jul 2005 04:10:15 GMT (envelope-from gnats@freefall.freebsd.org) Received: (from gnats@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.13.3/8.13.1/Submit) id j6Q4AFpr019745; Tue, 26 Jul 2005 04:10:15 GMT (envelope-from gnats) Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2005 04:10:15 GMT Message-Id: <200507260410.j6Q4AFpr019745@freefall.freebsd.org> To: freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.org From: Alexander Botero-Lowry Cc: Subject: Re: conf/84030: [patch] /etc/rc.d/power_profile is not a real rc.d script X-BeenThere: freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Alexander Botero-Lowry List-Id: Bug reports List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2005 04:10:16 -0000 The following reply was made to PR conf/84030; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Alexander Botero-Lowry To: bug-followup@FreeBSD.org, drax@stampede.org, brooks@one-eyed-alien.net Cc: Subject: Re: conf/84030: [patch] /etc/rc.d/power_profile is not a real rc.d script Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2005 21:06:49 -0700 That's fine. But still /etc/rc.d/dhclient complies with section 4.2.3 of Design and Implementation of the NetBSD rc.d system. I don't have a -CURRENT or -BETA box so I can't say about /etc/rc.d/wpa_supplicant. Maybe scripts related to devd should get /etc/dev.d or something? I really can't say the answer to this I just know that /etc/rc.d/power_profile doesn't belong and it's not because it's a non-startup script. It doesn't belong because it doesn't follow section 4.2.3 of the document that defines how rc .d scripts that derive from the NetBSD system are supposed to work. Alexander [drax@stampede.org, I had the mail bounce so I'm using another account]