From owner-freebsd-sparc64@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Sep 9 15:33:51 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: sparc64@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-sparc64@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 965D316A403 for ; Sat, 9 Sep 2006 15:33:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kip.macy@gmail.com) Received: from py-out-1112.google.com (py-out-1112.google.com [64.233.166.183]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B2B3343D46 for ; Sat, 9 Sep 2006 15:33:50 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kip.macy@gmail.com) Received: by py-out-1112.google.com with SMTP id o67so1240019pye for ; Sat, 09 Sep 2006 08:33:50 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=PzoO6X0fmjgHY5qHFUCJD8u99HpvdQJ9lICbBjZMiePNpLUlUhp+KtKQF+idFoJEqqLZLYsWmuXUCdlhHo6DYdNqsK97hcfsdxbCkrjCssEr/7YNSwzdzdyUTnisXEu4rUqbKwnil776tFXqQHa26CXuSQ0ffjmJP1wU/6Vup4A= Received: by 10.65.160.7 with SMTP id m7mr3020438qbo; Sat, 09 Sep 2006 08:33:50 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.65.224.1 with HTTP; Sat, 9 Sep 2006 08:33:50 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Sat, 9 Sep 2006 08:33:50 -0700 From: "Kip Macy" To: obrien@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <20060909011251.GB69575@dragon.NUXI.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <80928ADC-9063-4FD2-90C7-6E87D7041617@mac.com> <20060901145900.B97855@demos.bsdclusters.com> <20060909011251.GB69575@dragon.NUXI.org> Cc: Kip Macy , sparc64@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Thread Local Storage X-BeenThere: freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the Sparc List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 09 Sep 2006 15:33:51 -0000 I can't answer the TLS question at this instant (on my blackberry). However, I can say that due to the introduction of new privileged registers sun4v will not compile with the binutils in the tree. I'd like to think we want to be able to build for sun hardware that isn't EOL. On 9/8/06, David O'Brien wrote: > On Fri, Sep 01, 2006 at 03:01:50PM -0700, Kip Macy wrote: > > To the best of my knowledge no one is currently working on it. I think > > we're still waiting on an import of a more recent binutils which adds > > sun4v and TLS support. > > Yeah, yeah, yeah - that BS again. > I was forced to import a Binutils we didn't need to get TLS on i386 - and > DFR didn't at all need it to to make TLS work on i386. > > Please back up your claims. Download the latest binutils, compile it > locally and please send me details on what is missing from a BU POV. > > -- > -- David (obrien@FreeBSD.org) > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-sparc64 > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-sparc64-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >