From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Nov 4 03:15:46 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 66D3516A4CE for ; Thu, 4 Nov 2004 03:15:46 +0000 (GMT) Received: from obsecurity.dyndns.org (CPE0050040655c8-CM00111ae02aac.cpe.net.cable.rogers.com [69.194.102.143]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2FA1343D46 for ; Thu, 4 Nov 2004 03:15:46 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org) Received: by obsecurity.dyndns.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 8279051221; Wed, 3 Nov 2004 19:17:58 -0800 (PST) Date: Wed, 3 Nov 2004 19:17:58 -0800 From: Kris Kennaway To: Sam Lawrance Message-ID: <20041104031758.GA75628@xor.obsecurity.org> References: <20041103210949.GA2329@laptoxa.toxa.lan> <20041103212237.GA10524@xor.obsecurity.org> <1099534047.722.2.camel@dirk.no.domain> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="5vNYLRcllDrimb99" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1099534047.722.2.camel@dirk.no.domain> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i cc: ports@freebsd.org cc: Kris Kennaway Subject: Re: native openoffice 1.1.3 package? X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 04 Nov 2004 03:15:46 -0000 --5vNYLRcllDrimb99 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, Nov 04, 2004 at 01:07:27PM +1100, Sam Lawrance wrote: > On Wed, 2004-11-03 at 13:22 -0800, Kris Kennaway wrote: > > On Thu, Nov 04, 2004 at 12:09:49AM +0300, Toxa wrote: > > > On ftp://ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/ports/i386/packages-6-current/Al= l/ > > > we have *-openoffice-1.1.3.tbz for many languages, but what about nat= ive > > > openoffice package build? Moreover, there's no ru-openoffice-1.1.3.tb= z here.=20 > > > I'm just wondering about it because OpenOffice-1.1.3 doesn't compiles > > > neither on current nor on 5_stable > >=20 > > The openoffice builds are problematic because they take so long, and > > they often time out on the package build cluster (i.e. when multiple > > OO builds end up being scheduled on the same machine). Fixing this > > properly will require some nontrivial work. >=20 > Could you adjust the timeout to sort-of scale with a port's distfile > size? The problem is that multiple builds are being dispatched to the same machines, so it takes N times as long as a single build. I need to build in some kind of repulsion against scheduling more than one such obese port per machine. If I were to just increase the timeout then it would end up idling the whole build cluster for 2 or 3 days while those concurrent openoffice packages all build on a small number of machines. Kris --5vNYLRcllDrimb99 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFBiZ9mWry0BWjoQKURAgykAJ9IVgkRzerZgYKC4neOSHyUf+E4hwCghmZu eVN90rGXp6h0NcKMtO2u448= =a6wb -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --5vNYLRcllDrimb99--