Date: Mon, 22 Dec 2003 08:03:28 -0600 (CST) From: Mike Silbersack <silby@silby.com> To: Alfred Perlstein <bright@mu.org> Cc: hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: support for __thread Message-ID: <20031222080119.Y2799@odysseus.silby.com> In-Reply-To: <20031221203311.GW60229@elvis.mu.org> References: <20031221135622.GU60229@elvis.mu.org> <Pine.GSO.4.10.10312211507050.23814-100000@pcnet5.pcnet.com> <20031221203311.GW60229@elvis.mu.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sun, 21 Dec 2003, Alfred Perlstein wrote: > Any idea of how much effort it would take? I have no clue as to > how to fix our toolchain, gooing the work in ld.so doesn't see > that awful, but it's not trivial either: > > http://people.freebsd.org/~alfred/tls.pdf > > I want a threaded webstone so that I can generate a lot more load > with wimpier client boxes on FreeBSD. While you're working on gcc / our linker, you may want to investigate this article that I just saw on news.google.com as well: --- GCC summit in Kuwait concludes meetings, approves ''anti-terrorism'' agreement --- I'm not sure exactly what OS support that requires, but having it would certainly put us ahead of OpenBSD's ProPolice + nonexec stack! Mike "Silby" Silbersack
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20031222080119.Y2799>