From owner-svn-src-stable@freebsd.org Sat Aug 13 16:41:30 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: svn-src-stable@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C92A9BB8E8F; Sat, 13 Aug 2016 16:41:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from slw@zxy.spb.ru) Received: from zxy.spb.ru (zxy.spb.ru [195.70.199.98]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8C6871BAE; Sat, 13 Aug 2016 16:41:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from slw@zxy.spb.ru) Received: from slw by zxy.spb.ru with local (Exim 4.86 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1bYbzs-000EzX-Rw; Sat, 13 Aug 2016 19:41:20 +0300 Date: Sat, 13 Aug 2016 19:41:20 +0300 From: Slawa Olhovchenkov To: Andriy Gapon Cc: svn-src-stable@FreeBSD.org, svn-src-all@FreeBSD.org, src-committers@FreeBSD.org, svn-src-stable-11@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r303970 - in stable/11/sys/cddl: compat/opensolaris/sys contrib/opensolaris/uts/common/fs/zfs contrib/opensolaris/uts/common/fs/zfs/sys Message-ID: <20160813164120.GH22212@zxy.spb.ru> References: <201608112048.u7BKm4OH076291@repo.freebsd.org> <20160811223331.GF22212@zxy.spb.ru> <494cba4a-166f-e7e6-4599-7091b50be1ef@FreeBSD.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <494cba4a-166f-e7e6-4599-7091b50be1ef@FreeBSD.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.24 (2015-08-30) X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: slw@zxy.spb.ru X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on zxy.spb.ru); SAEximRunCond expanded to false X-BeenThere: svn-src-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: SVN commit messages for all the -stable branches of the src tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 13 Aug 2016 16:41:30 -0000 On Fri, Aug 12, 2016 at 09:51:42AM +0300, Andriy Gapon wrote: > On 12/08/2016 01:33, Slawa Olhovchenkov wrote: > > MFC to 10.x/9.x planed? > > I would like to do it, but it depends on how hard it would be to merge the code. > If it's trivial, then I'll certainly do it. > If it's very hard, then I will not do it myself. But if anybody merges and > tests the change, then I'll be happy to commit it. 303970 cleanly applayed to stable/10 after 303969 (303969 cleanly applayed w/o changed). I am can't test result becaus don't touch bug. > Also, I would normally use a much longer MFC period for such a change. It was > short only to get the change into 11.0. So, I'll wait for a couple more weeks > before even trying to MFC the change to stable/10 and 9.