From owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG  Sat Jun  7 04:08:21 2003
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 300F237B40D; Sat,  7 Jun 2003 04:08:21 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from shrike.submonkey.net (pc1-cdif2-5-cust38.cdif.cable.ntl.com
	[81.101.150.38])	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 3555F43F85; Sat,  7 Jun 2003 04:08:20 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from setantae@submonkey.net)
Received: from setantae by shrike.submonkey.net with local (Exim 4.20)
	id 19ObYY-0000Zf-S3; Sat, 07 Jun 2003 12:08:18 +0100
Date: Sat, 7 Jun 2003 12:08:18 +0100
From: Ceri Davies <ceri@FreeBSD.org>
To: Doug Barton <DougB@FreeBSD.org>
Message-ID: <20030607110818.GA1895@submonkey.net>
Mail-Followup-To: Ceri Davies <ceri@FreeBSD.org>,
	Doug Barton <DougB@FreeBSD.org>, Sean Chittenden <seanc@FreeBSD.org>,
	freebsd-arch@freebsd.org
References: <20030605235254.W5414@znfgre.qbhto.arg>
	<20030606175954.GQ65470@perrin.int.nxad.com>
	<20030606231209.F15459@znfgre.qbhto.arg>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20030606231209.F15459@znfgre.qbhto.arg>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.4i
Sender: Ceri Davies <setantae@submonkey.net>
cc: Sean Chittenden <seanc@FreeBSD.org>
cc: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: Way forward with BIND 8
X-BeenThere: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion related to FreeBSD architecture
	<freebsd-arch.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-arch>,
	<mailto:freebsd-arch-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-arch>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-arch@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-arch-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-arch>,
	<mailto:freebsd-arch-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 07 Jun 2003 11:08:21 -0000

On Fri, Jun 06, 2003 at 11:33:40PM -0700, Doug Barton wrote:

> If we can get enough consensus, and most importantly, people to test it,
> I'd be very interested in the idea of removing BIND from 6-Current
> altogether, with the exception of whatever libs/headers are deemed
> essential, and the userland binaries dig and host. Since I can already
> hear the whining about not having nslookup, we should probably include
> that too, although I'd dearly love to nuke it.

I'd say nuke nslookup as well if this route gets taken. It doesn't exist
in the BIND9 world anyway, so at best including it would only delay the
whining.

Ceri
--