From owner-freebsd-current Fri Mar 10 18:06:35 1995 Return-Path: current-owner Received: (from majordom@localhost) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) id SAA29812 for current-outgoing; Fri, 10 Mar 1995 18:06:35 -0800 Received: from godzilla.zeta.org.au (godzilla.zeta.org.au [203.2.228.34]) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) with ESMTP id SAA29798 for ; Fri, 10 Mar 1995 18:06:19 -0800 Received: (from bde@localhost) by godzilla.zeta.org.au (8.6.9/8.6.9) id MAA15780; Sat, 11 Mar 1995 12:04:04 +1000 Date: Sat, 11 Mar 1995 12:04:04 +1000 From: Bruce Evans Message-Id: <199503110204.MAA15780@godzilla.zeta.org.au> To: davidg@Root.COM, phk@ref.tfs.com Subject: Re: HEADS UP - About removing libgcc.so.261 Cc: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.org, wollman@halloran-eldar.lcs.mit.edu Sender: current-owner@FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk >>Actually, I guess I have found an even better solution: >> >> move ths shared libgcc to /usr/lib/FreeBSD-2.0-compat >> tell ldconfig about that directory. >> >>ld should not find it, but ldconfig will... > This will work (and we should do this), but people doing upgrades will >still have the old libgcc.so. I'll be committing a (very) good fix for the >problem shortly. The same fix is probably required for other previously-shared libraries such as libcompat. I'm still concerned about the static libgcc unnecessarily bloating all executables by 4K, partly because the of linkage order bugs. Bruce