From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 25 22:13:57 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 151CE106566B for ; Mon, 25 Jan 2010 22:13:57 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from john@dexter.starfire.mn.org) Received: from dexter.starfire.mn.org (starfire.skypoint.net [173.8.102.29]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AB6388FC12 for ; Mon, 25 Jan 2010 22:13:56 +0000 (UTC) Received: (from john@localhost) by dexter.starfire.mn.org (8.11.3/8.11.3) id o0PMDtH01794 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Mon, 25 Jan 2010 16:13:55 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from john) Date: Mon, 25 Jan 2010 16:13:55 -0600 From: John To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20100125161355.A1778@starfire.mn.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5.1i Subject: options IPFIREWALL and IPDIVERT or loader.conf? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 25 Jan 2010 22:13:57 -0000 I guess I can either pre-buuild a kernel with options IPFIREWALL and IPDIVERT, or I can load them via loader.conf. Why would I not always do the latter? Is there any advantage to pre-linking them? Thanks! -- John Lind john@starfire.MN.ORG