From owner-freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Sep 1 20:10:01 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-bugs@smarthost.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C16D8CDA for ; Sun, 1 Sep 2013 20:10:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206c::16:87]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AB437231A for ; Sun, 1 Sep 2013 20:10:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.7/8.14.7) with ESMTP id r81KA1H1016314 for ; Sun, 1 Sep 2013 20:10:01 GMT (envelope-from gnats@freefall.freebsd.org) Received: (from gnats@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.7/8.14.7/Submit) id r81KA1dQ016313; Sun, 1 Sep 2013 20:10:01 GMT (envelope-from gnats) Date: Sun, 1 Sep 2013 20:10:01 GMT Message-Id: <201309012010.r81KA1dQ016313@freefall.freebsd.org> To: freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.org Cc: From: Mike Harding Subject: Re: kern/181632: 9.2-RC3 - on resume from suspend, disk operations are slower X-BeenThere: freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list Reply-To: Mike Harding List-Id: Bug reports List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 01 Sep 2013 20:10:01 -0000 The following reply was made to PR kern/181632; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Mike Harding To: Andriy Gapon Cc: bug-followup@freebsd.org Subject: Re: kern/181632: 9.2-RC3 - on resume from suspend, disk operations are slower Date: Sun, 1 Sep 2013 13:06:40 -0700 --047d7b624dfe6cf35604e557fe2a Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 I believe that code that put the ACPI_ENABLE_IRQS() in was in this commit: http://svnweb.freebsd.org/base/head/sys/dev/acpica/acpi_cpu.c?annotate=122766 The author made a distinction between using ACPI_ENABLE_IRQS() and acpi_cpu_c1() in this code, both are used in different parts of the code, added with the same commit. If the distinctions are not necessary, I don't know why the author would make them. --047d7b624dfe6cf35604e557fe2a Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
I believe that code that put the ACPI_ENABLE_IRQS() in was= in this commit:
The author made a distinction between using ACPI_ENABLE_IRQS= () and
acpi_cpu_c1() in this code, both are used in different parts of = the code, added with
the same commit.=A0 If the distinctions are not nec= essary, I don't know why the author
would make them.
--047d7b624dfe6cf35604e557fe2a--