From owner-freebsd-ports  Fri Feb 27 15:35:30 1998
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG>
Received: (from majordom@localhost)
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id PAA27811
          for freebsd-ports-outgoing; Fri, 27 Feb 1998 15:35:30 -0800 (PST)
          (envelope-from owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG)
Received: from vader.cs.berkeley.edu (vader.CS.Berkeley.EDU [128.32.38.234])
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id PAA27801
          for <ports@freebsd.org>; Fri, 27 Feb 1998 15:35:17 -0800 (PST)
          (envelope-from asami@vader.cs.berkeley.edu)
Received: (from asami@localhost) by vader.cs.berkeley.edu (8.8.7/8.7.3) id PAA18607; Fri, 27 Feb 1998 15:35:13 -0800 (PST)
Date: Fri, 27 Feb 1998 15:35:13 -0800 (PST)
Message-Id: <199802272335.PAA18607@vader.cs.berkeley.edu>
To: obrien@NUXI.com
CC: ports@FreeBSD.ORG
In-reply-to: <19980227140008.03597@nuxi.com> (obrien@NUXI.com)
Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/misc/xopps Makefile
From: asami@FreeBSD.ORG (Satoshi Asami)
Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org

 * If you find any package is dynamically linked, you should send a PR on
 * it.  All offically-built packages should be statically linked.

There wasn't a PR but a report to the ports list by Charles Henrich
(henrich@crh.cl.msu.edu) about the packages-current version being
dynamically linked.  Andreas probably saw it and misunderstood the
problem.

Satoshi

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message