Date: Sun, 20 Dec 2015 22:45:08 +0100 From: Michael Grimm <trashcan@odo.in-berlin.de> To: freebsd-jail@freebsd.org, freebsd-questions <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: How to define the order of starting jails? Message-ID: <1AC66193-4091-4D5A-8183-FAECA843A739@odo.in-berlin.de> In-Reply-To: <1450646902.27618.19.camel@michaeleichorn.com> References: <5D6BA0FE-60E1-4C6B-906B-BB62A1AB9BE8@odo.in-berlin.de> <1450639510.27618.8.camel@michaeleichorn.com> <BE5B509A-9D84-46A3-BADB-E641E6BD51F7@odo.in-berlin.de> <1450646902.27618.19.camel@michaeleichorn.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Michael B. Eichorn <ike@michaeleichorn.com> wrote: >=20 > On Sun, 2015-12-20 at 20:57 +0100, Michael Grimm wrote: >> Michael B. Eichorn <ike@michaeleichorn.com> wrote: >>> Does `service jail restart` do what you are looking for? >>=20 >> Bingo! That made the trick! Thank you very, very much! Cool! That >> command is stopping and starting jails in the order as listed in >> "jail_list". Ok, it isn't stopping jails in the reverse order, but >> that is no big deal, though. >=20 > I think that this came up before and there was a patch sumbitted to > stop in the reverse order, It might be fixed in current. I don't = really > remember the specifics and I cannot find it now, but something was = done > about this before. Ok. I'm following stable, thus it might arrive soon. But, at least at my = servers, that is no big deal. Stopping is so fast =E2=80=A6 (only 8 = service jails). But there might be conditions where reverse order might = be of advantage. >> [Arrrgh, I never heard of "service" before (after so many years with >> FBSD) :-( What a shame ...] >=20 > Always more to learn. :) Yep, definitely so! [And I did start programming/computing with = https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/PDP-11 ;-)] With kind regards, Michael
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?1AC66193-4091-4D5A-8183-FAECA843A739>