From owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jul 26 08:04:27 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: arch@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 68DA44A9; Fri, 26 Jul 2013 08:04:27 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from brde@optusnet.com.au) Received: from mail104.syd.optusnet.com.au (mail104.syd.optusnet.com.au [211.29.132.246]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F053C2B31; Fri, 26 Jul 2013 08:04:26 +0000 (UTC) Received: from c122-106-156-23.carlnfd1.nsw.optusnet.com.au (c122-106-156-23.carlnfd1.nsw.optusnet.com.au [122.106.156.23]) by mail104.syd.optusnet.com.au (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D8324421CE8; Fri, 26 Jul 2013 18:04:16 +1000 (EST) Date: Fri, 26 Jul 2013 18:04:15 +1000 (EST) From: Bruce Evans X-X-Sender: bde@besplex.bde.org To: Pawel Jakub Dawidek Subject: Re: General purpose library for name/value pairs. In-Reply-To: <20130725202832.GD1400@garage.freebsd.pl> Message-ID: <20130726175858.Y1061@besplex.bde.org> References: <20130704215329.GG1402@garage.freebsd.pl> <4818.1373008073@critter.freebsd.dk> <20130705195255.GB25842@garage.freebsd.pl> <60317.1373055040@critter.freebsd.dk> <20130708150308.GE1383@garage.freebsd.pl> <717D098F-D07E-45B0-B9F0-8D8BCEF06923@mail.turbofuzz.com> <20130708213351.GB1405@garage.freebsd.pl> <20130725202832.GD1400@garage.freebsd.pl> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-Optus-CM-Score: 0 X-Optus-CM-Analysis: v=2.1 cv=Yos2GeoX c=1 sm=1 tr=0 a=ebeQFi2P/qHVC0Yw9JDJ4g==:117 a=PO7r1zJSAAAA:8 a=kxgCfahG5_wA:10 a=kj9zAlcOel0A:10 a=JzwRw_2MAAAA:8 a=_Sy8tSWxdDoA:10 a=ikobWQWbF5fDs0AyT1kA:9 a=CjuIK1q_8ugA:10 a=pvCz57ccC64A:10 a=R1H_hwPTxAgA:10 Cc: arch@freebsd.org, "Jordan K. Hubbard" X-BeenThere: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion related to FreeBSD architecture List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 26 Jul 2013 08:04:27 -0000 On Thu, 25 Jul 2013, Pawel Jakub Dawidek wrote: > Returning to this thread after a short break. I removed all > {,u}int{8,16.32.64} types and implemented only 'number' type which is > uint64_t. Looks much nicer now. The numeric type should be floating point. Or better yet, bignum. Or more practically, uintmax_t. Bruce