From owner-freebsd-current Tue May 4 11:27:34 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from apollo.backplane.com (apollo.backplane.com [209.157.86.2]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 03FE2154E6 for ; Tue, 4 May 1999 11:27:28 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from dillon@apollo.backplane.com) Received: (from dillon@localhost) by apollo.backplane.com (8.9.3/8.9.1) id LAA14894; Tue, 4 May 1999 11:27:26 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from dillon) Date: Tue, 4 May 1999 11:27:26 -0700 (PDT) From: Matthew Dillon Message-Id: <199905041827.LAA14894@apollo.backplane.com> To: Tony Finch Cc: current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: NFS Patch #8 for current available - new TCP fixes References: Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG :> remainder of the packet - the ip payload - to NOT be 4-byte aligned. : :We're planning to try replacing some Solaris web servers with FreeBSD :machines in the near future. The documents are on a read-only NFS :filestore connected to the web servers with CDDI. (Updates will stay :on a Sun box.) Are we going to have nfs_realign problems if we use TCP :in this situation or should we stick with UDP? : :Tony. TCP should be very close to UDP now on current. I hope to get a patch for the TCP fixes into -stable for the 3.2 release. There are still bugs in NFS, but they are considerably less serious then before. -Matt Matthew Dillon To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message