From owner-freebsd-bugs Tue Jul 10 18:30: 8 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-bugs@hub.freebsd.org Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [216.136.204.21]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C6A1037B403 for ; Tue, 10 Jul 2001 18:30:02 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Received: (from gnats@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.11.3/8.11.3) id f6B1U2Q69950; Tue, 10 Jul 2001 18:30:02 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from gnats) Date: Tue, 10 Jul 2001 18:30:02 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: <200107110130.f6B1U2Q69950@freefall.freebsd.org> To: freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.org Cc: From: "Richard A. Steenbergen" Subject: Re: conf/28882: Network defaults are absurdly low. Reply-To: "Richard A. Steenbergen" Sender: owner-freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.org The following reply was made to PR conf/28882; it has been noted by GNATS. From: "Richard A. Steenbergen" To: Leo Bicknell Cc: FreeBSD-gnats-submit@freebsd.org, billf@elvis.mu.org Subject: Re: conf/28882: Network defaults are absurdly low. Date: Tue, 10 Jul 2001 21:22:01 -0400 (EDT) On Tue, 10 Jul 2001, Leo Bicknell wrote: > Also, FWIW, there is a related bug that keeps Richard's suggestion > from working, it would appear: > > http://www.FreeBSD.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=11966 > > So even if his idea is deemed the best solution, something else needs > to be fixed to get network performance up to par. Note the date and version of this PR. May 31 1999, FreeBSD 2.2.6. -- Richard A Steenbergen http://www.e-gerbil.net/ras PGP Key ID: 0x138EA177 (67 29 D7 BC E8 18 3E DA B2 46 B3 D8 14 36 FE B6) To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-bugs" in the body of the message