From owner-freebsd-current Tue Aug 20 07:50:43 1996 Return-Path: owner-current Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) id HAA04025 for current-outgoing; Tue, 20 Aug 1996 07:50:43 -0700 (PDT) Received: from grumble.grondar.za (root@grumble.grondar.za [196.7.18.130]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) with ESMTP id HAA04018; Tue, 20 Aug 1996 07:50:36 -0700 (PDT) Received: from grumble.grondar.za (mark@localhost.grondar.za [127.0.0.1]) by grumble.grondar.za (8.7.5/8.7.3) with ESMTP id QAA24308; Tue, 20 Aug 1996 16:49:39 +0200 (SAT) Message-Id: <199608201449.QAA24308@grumble.grondar.za> To: =?KOI8-R?Q?=E1=CE=C4=D2=C5=CA_=FE=C5=D2=CE=CF=D7?= (Andrey A. Chernov) cc: current@freebsd.org, secure@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Secure telnet duplicating: secure & eBones both... Date: Tue, 20 Aug 1996 16:49:38 +0200 From: Mark Murray Sender: owner-current@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk =?KOI8-R?Q?=E1=CE=C4=D2=C5=CA_=FE=C5=D2=CE=CF=D7?= wrote: > I wonder found it in two places. > Makefile's assumes that it will be in secure, but recently it was > copyed to eBones for reasons unclear for me. > Secure Telnet not relays specifically on eBones as designed: > several encryption hooks present there while only eBones > really implemented. I think, other variants will be implemented > in the feature. And what? Move it back from eBones then? > In any case, having it in two places is space waste. This (duplication) is so I can do the move withoutbreaking what we have already. Whatever happens, sno matter how many security features are in Secure Telnet, it will still require the Kerberos libraries. M -- Mark Murray 46 Harvey Rd, Claremont, Cape Town 7700, South Africa +27 21 61-3768 GMT+0200 Finger mark@grondar.za for PGP key