From owner-freebsd-hackers Wed Oct 2 12:21:15 1996 Return-Path: owner-hackers Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) id MAA29640 for hackers-outgoing; Wed, 2 Oct 1996 12:21:15 -0700 (PDT) Received: from paris.CS.Berkeley.EDU (paris.CS.Berkeley.EDU [128.32.34.47]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) with SMTP id MAA29633 for ; Wed, 2 Oct 1996 12:21:09 -0700 (PDT) Received: (from jmacd@localhost) by paris.CS.Berkeley.EDU (8.6.11/8.6.9) id MAA03816 for freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org; Wed, 2 Oct 1996 12:21:08 -0700 Date: Wed, 2 Oct 1996 12:21:08 -0700 From: Josh MacDonald Message-Id: <199610021921.MAA03816@paris.CS.Berkeley.EDU> To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Subject: rand() and random() Sender: owner-hackers@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk I'm curious why rand() still exists. Everyone knows its really bad. Why not just ditch it in favor of random()? -josh