From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Oct 4 18:59:29 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 917AC16A4CE for ; Mon, 4 Oct 2004 18:59:29 +0000 (GMT) Received: from internet.potentialtech.com (h-66-167-251-6.phlapafg.covad.net [66.167.251.6]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5FDF043D46 for ; Mon, 4 Oct 2004 18:59:29 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from wmoran@potentialtech.com) Received: from working.potentialtech.com (pa-plum-cmts1e-68-68-113-64.pittpa.adelphia.net [68.68.113.64]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by internet.potentialtech.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 379BB69A39; Mon, 4 Oct 2004 14:59:28 -0400 (EDT) Date: Mon, 4 Oct 2004 14:59:27 -0400 From: Bill Moran To: regi@inf.ufrgs.br Message-Id: <20041004145927.74ad8b47.wmoran@potentialtech.com> In-Reply-To: <1096915733.41619b153c86a@webmail.inf.ufrgs.br> References: <1096915733.41619b153c86a@webmail.inf.ufrgs.br> Organization: Potential Technologies X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 0.9.12 (GTK+ 1.2.10; i386-portbld-freebsd4.9) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable cc: questions@FreeBSD.org cc: regi@inf.ufrgs.br Subject: Re: C compiler X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 04 Oct 2004 18:59:29 -0000 regi@inf.ufrgs.br wrote: >=20 > Hello, >=20 > I=B4ve installed FreeBSD 5.2.1 in my PC machine. I compiled my own > programs and started to running them. For my surprise, I checked that > FreeBSD programs spent almost 50% more time than the same program compiled > to linux. I checked several compile options, but it did not have good res= ults. 5.2.1 is not a strong performer. It's ALPHA code. If you want to do performance testing, either use 4.10, or work with the 5.3 BETAs. 5.2.1 isn't supposed to be fast yet. --=20 Bill Moran Potential Technologies http://www.potentialtech.com