Date: Mon, 7 Aug 2006 17:37:40 +0300 From: "victor cruceru" <victor.cruceru@gmail.com> To: "Dan Nelson" <dnelson@allantgroup.com> Cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org, Gleb Smirnoff <glebius@freebsd.org>, freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: SMUX (RFC 1227) implementation for BSNMPd Message-ID: <49402550608070737p5b2604i5134aa5a6168049e@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <20060807141614.GA16880@dan.emsphone.com> References: <49402550608041418j1b4d2ac9r66cae310c11e7ec5@mail.gmail.com> <20060807094057.GT96644@FreeBSD.org> <20060807141614.GA16880@dan.emsphone.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Hi Dan, Yes, this is true. But for a simple IPC between master agent and sub-agents I think it is still good enough. On 8/7/06, Dan Nelson <dnelson@allantgroup.com> wrote: > In the last episode (Aug 07), Gleb Smirnoff said: > > On Sat, Aug 05, 2006 at 12:18:19AM +0300, victor cruceru wrote: > > > I'm glad to announce an implementation of the venerable SNMP SMUX > > > protocol for FreeBSD SNMP agent, bsnmpd. You can grab it from its > > > wiki page http://wikitest.freebsd.org/SnmpSmux There you will find > > > instructions about how to build it (it is a patch against -current) > > > and how to play with it. For now it is only a bsnmpd module (the > > > "server side") - but if someone is interested I have plans to write > > > a libsmux library and API to be used in building smux peers (the > > > "client side"). > > > > Cool! As soon as libsmux is done, I must chase myself to > > write SNMP support for mpd. > > I thought SMUX was obsoleted many years ago by AgentX (RFC 2257) ? > > -- > Dan Nelson > dnelson@allantgroup.com > -- victor cruceru ------------------------------------------------ Non est respondendum ad omnia. ( Cicero, Pro Murena Oratio ) ------------------------------------------------
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?49402550608070737p5b2604i5134aa5a6168049e>