From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 21 19:23:27 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 03B4A1065673 for ; Wed, 21 Jan 2009 19:23:27 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from amarat@ksu.ru) Received: from mx.kzn.ru (mx.kzn.ru [194.85.243.39]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6F8BB8FC12 for ; Wed, 21 Jan 2009 19:23:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from amarat@ksu.ru) X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.37,301,1231102800"; d="scan'208";a="1294944" Received: from mail.ksu.ru (HELO ruby.ksu.ru) ([193.232.252.56]) by iout.kzn.ru with ESMTP; 21 Jan 2009 22:23:24 +0300 X-Pass-Through: Kazan State University Network Received: from zealot.ksu.ru ([194.85.245.161]) by ksu.ru (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id n0LJKr1K001080; Wed, 21 Jan 2009 19:20:54 GMT Received: from zealot.ksu.ru (localhost.lnet [127.0.0.1]) by zealot.ksu.ru (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id n0LJNC9f084078; Wed, 21 Jan 2009 22:23:13 +0300 (MSK) (envelope-from amarat@ksu.ru) Message-ID: <49777620.8080307@ksu.ru> Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2009 22:23:12 +0300 From: "Marat N.Afanasyev" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD amd64; en-US; rv:1.8.1.16) Gecko/20080903 SeaMonkey/1.1.11 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Dan Langille References: <49774BAE.3000809@ksu.ru> <49774D93.2080503@langille.org> In-Reply-To: <49774D93.2080503@langille.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=KOI8-R; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org, Pete French Subject: Re: interrupt storm on MSI IXP600 based motherboards X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2009 19:23:27 -0000 Dan Langille wrote: > Marat N.Afanasyev wrote: >> Pete French wrote: >>>> trouble with onboard re(4) was resolved in -CURRENT and -STABLE, but >>>> storms are not bound to ethernet only. storm may appear on any >>>> device. if any device generates enough interrupts rate, storm will >>>> arrive. >>> >>> Yes, I just got another storm, on my ATA controller this time. Ah >>> well, so much for the idea of disabling unneeded devices! >>> >>> -pete. >>> >> >> it's a kind of magic, really. I built a new kernel with KDB and DDB >> and after 1 day, 13:15 I'm still waiting for storm to arrive. And I added >> hw.acpi.osname="Linux" to /boot/loader.conf. > > If that solution works, it'd got to leave a 'bad' taste in your mouth. ;) > yeah, but it would taste not so bad as hw.acpi.osname="Windows ..." ;) -- SY, Marat