From owner-freebsd-hackers  Wed Jan 17 01:55:05 1996
Return-Path: owner-hackers
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) id BAA00304
          for hackers-outgoing; Wed, 17 Jan 1996 01:55:05 -0800 (PST)
Received: from rah.star-gate.com (rah.star-gate.com [204.188.121.18])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) with SMTP id BAA00296
          for <hackers@FreeBSD.ORG>; Wed, 17 Jan 1996 01:55:01 -0800 (PST)
Received: from rah.star-gate.com (localhost.v-site.net [127.0.0.1]) by rah.star-gate.com (8.6.12/8.6.12) with ESMTP id BAA00779; Wed, 17 Jan 1996 01:54:43 -0800
Message-Id: <199601170954.BAA00779@rah.star-gate.com>
X-Mailer: exmh version 1.6.5 12/11/95
To: Julian Elischer <julian@ref.tfs.com>
cc: hackers@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject: Re: BSDvs Lxxxxx Flame.. 
In-reply-to: Your message of "Wed, 17 Jan 1996 01:18:59 PST."
             <199601170918.BAA26568@ref.tfs.com> 
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Date: Wed, 17 Jan 1996 01:54:42 -0800
From: "Amancio Hasty Jr." <hasty@rah.star-gate.com>
Sender: owner-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk

Someone should respond and state that freebsd, netbsd and bsdi are
widely available and in the case of bsdi that is a commercial
product for those who like that sort of things. Additionally,
I consider them all to be stable platforms.

	Cheers,
	Amancio


>>> Julian Elischer said:
 > 
 > having read the article, I must say that BSD comes off second best
 > the claim that Linux Networking comes from BSD is of course False,
 > though BSD networking was once ported to linux (but lost the fight due to
 > legal fears I think)
 > 
 > better to be a friendly rival that a churlish one..
 > 
 > 
 > 
 > 
 >