From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jul 9 21:26:54 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: net@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C909B1065671 for ; Wed, 9 Jul 2008 21:26:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gnn@neville-neil.com) Received: from proxy.meer.net (proxy.meer.net [64.13.141.13]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A2FC28FC14 for ; Wed, 9 Jul 2008 21:26:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gnn@neville-neil.com) Received: from mail.meer.net (mail.meer.net [64.13.141.3]) by proxy.meer.net (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id m69LQqjQ076213 for ; Wed, 9 Jul 2008 14:26:54 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from gnn@neville-neil.com) Received: from mail2.meer.net (mail2.meer.net [64.13.141.16]) by mail.meer.net (8.13.3/8.13.3/meer) with ESMTP id m69LPqfd086756 for ; Wed, 9 Jul 2008 14:25:52 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from gnn@neville-neil.com) Received: from minion.local.neville-neil.com (209.249.190.254.available.above.net [209.249.190.254] (may be forged)) (authenticated bits=0) by mail2.meer.net (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id m69LPqgm040183 for ; Wed, 9 Jul 2008 14:25:52 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from gnn@neville-neil.com) Date: Wed, 09 Jul 2008 17:25:51 -0400 Message-ID: From: gnn@freebsd.org To: net@freebsd.org User-Agent: Wanderlust/2.15.5 (Almost Unreal) SEMI/1.14.6 (Maruoka) FLIM/1.14.9 (=?ISO-8859-4?Q?Goj=F2?=) APEL/10.7 Emacs/22.1.50 (i386-apple-darwin8.11.1) MULE/5.0 (SAKAKI) MIME-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI 1.14.6 - "Maruoka") Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII X-Canit-CHI2: 0.50 X-Bayes-Prob: 0.5 (Score 0, tokens from: ) X-Spam-Score: 0.10 () [Tag at 5.00] COMBINED_FROM X-CanItPRO-Stream: default X-Canit-Stats-ID: 902236 - a23f3521c173 X-Scanned-By: CanIt (www . roaringpenguin . com) on 64.13.141.13 Cc: Subject: What's the deal with hardware checksum and net.inet.udp.checksum? X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 09 Jul 2008 21:26:54 -0000 I would assume that if a card, say the em, has hardware TX checksum that the UDP checksum could be calculated by the hardware, but this seems not to be the case. The manual pages are unhelpful in this regard. Thanks, George