From owner-freebsd-current Mon Feb 10 18:15: 2 2003 Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0A52437B401 for ; Mon, 10 Feb 2003 18:15:01 -0800 (PST) Received: from seed.net.tw (sn13.seed.net.tw [139.175.54.13]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2677943F3F for ; Mon, 10 Feb 2003 18:15:00 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from leafy@leafy.idv.tw) Received: from [211.74.134.242] (port=49167 helo=leafy.idv.tw) by seed.net.tw with esmtp (Seednet 4.10:4) id 18iPwp-0003ta-00 for freebsd-current@freebsd.org; Tue, 11 Feb 2003 10:14:59 +0800 Received: from leafy.idv.tw (nobody@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by leafy.idv.tw (8.12.7/8.12.7) with ESMTP id h1B2Ewgd018612 for ; Tue, 11 Feb 2003 10:14:58 +0800 (CST) (envelope-from leafy@leafy.idv.tw) Received: (from leafy@localhost) by leafy.idv.tw (8.12.7/8.12.7/Submit) id h1B2Ew1S018611 for freebsd-current@freebsd.org; Tue, 11 Feb 2003 10:14:58 +0800 (CST) Date: Tue, 11 Feb 2003 10:14:58 +0800 From: leafy To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: GCC 3.2.2 import -- questions Message-ID: <20030211021458.GA18597@leafy.idv.tw> Mail-Followup-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org References: <20030210204245.E86987@volatile.chemikals.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=big5 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20030210204245.E86987@volatile.chemikals.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.3i Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Mon, Feb 10, 2003 at 08:44:33PM -0500, Wesley Morgan wrote: > The import of gcc 3.2.2 brings a question to mind... Many people have > mentioned problems with SSE / SSE2 instructions, optimizer problems etc > that are supposedly fixed with 3.2.2... My question is, should I consider > rebuilding my ports with this new compiler because of stability and/or > speed improvements? Or is this point release not worth the effort. lcms post-build tests now finishes correctly with pentium4 optimizations. And I have world with the p4 optimization with no ill-effact so far. Jiawei Ye -- "Without the userland, the kernel is useless." --inspired by The Tao of Programming To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message