From owner-freebsd-advocacy@FreeBSD.ORG Mon May 26 04:34:19 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-advocacy@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6F15337B401 for ; Mon, 26 May 2003 04:34:19 -0700 (PDT) Received: from bast.unixathome.org (bast.unixathome.org [66.11.174.150]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DF1E443F85 for ; Mon, 26 May 2003 04:34:18 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from dan@langille.org) Received: from wocker (wocker.unixathome.org [192.168.0.99]) by bast.unixathome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BB48E3D28; Mon, 26 May 2003 07:34:17 -0400 (EDT) From: "Dan Langille" To: ftyczka Date: Mon, 26 May 2003 07:34:17 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-ID: <3ED1C379.12979.A3BF2E1A@localhost> Priority: normal In-reply-to: <1378432161.20030526133204@ftyczka.org> X-mailer: Pegasus Mail for Windows (v4.02a) Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT Content-description: Mail message body cc: freebsd-advocacy@freebsd.org Subject: Re: different approach in FreeBSD advocacy X-BeenThere: freebsd-advocacy@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: FreeBSD Evangelism List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 26 May 2003 11:34:19 -0000 On 26 May 2003 at 13:32, ftyczka wrote: > Has anybody thought that maybe due to the recent Linux lawsuit by SCO, > it would be possible to take advantage of this situation, and promote > FreeBSD, as the one system that doesn't risk getting into any legal > problems? This was recently and extensively discussed, either on freebsd- advocacy@freebsd.org or freebsd-chat. Please read that. -- Dan Langille : http://www.langille.org/