Date: Fri, 21 Jun 1996 12:12:49 GMT From: James Raynard <fhackers@jraynard.demon.co.uk> To: phk@freebsd.org Cc: hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: cvs-cur-2135 Message-ID: <199606211212.MAA00681@jraynard.demon.co.uk> In-Reply-To: <6574.835328717@critter.tfs.com> (message from Poul-Henning Kamp on Thu, 20 Jun 1996 20:45:17 -0700)
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> Contrary to src-cur, cvs-cur >does< take some big hits every now and > then. I guess the "new" people needs a warning: > > When the tree gets hit by a tag, or something gets deleted, you will > see big deltas coming your way. Thanks. Having a local copy of the CVS tree is very handy, but now I know I can drop back to src-cur if cvs-cur gets too much. > Well, what can I say ? "Be prepared" is about the best of it. Fair enough, but it's impossible to be prepared for something if you aren't given any warning of it. I'm prepared for the gcc update and the next release as they have been discussed on the mailing lists, but I wasn't prepared for the PC98 and TCL imports as they literally appeared out of nowhere. > CTM is pretty much in the users hands right now. I have little or > no time to work on it, and generally are limited to review and > commit submissions from users. If you want it to cope better, > you will find the source in /usr/src/usr.sbin/ctm. Point taken! Actually, as I said before, CTM has worked extremely well for me and I'm very happy with it. The change I'd most like to see is a "reverse CTM" which allows you to commit things by email... Where did you say the source was again? 8-) -- James Raynard, Edinburgh, Scotland james@jraynard.demon.co.uk
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199606211212.MAA00681>