From owner-freebsd-current Fri May 10 06:55:13 1996 Return-Path: owner-current Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) id GAA17147 for current-outgoing; Fri, 10 May 1996 06:55:13 -0700 (PDT) Received: from brasil.moneng.mei.com (brasil.moneng.mei.com [151.186.109.160]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) with ESMTP id GAA17142 for ; Fri, 10 May 1996 06:55:09 -0700 (PDT) Received: (from jgreco@localhost) by brasil.moneng.mei.com (8.7.Beta.1/8.7.Beta.1) id IAA02313; Fri, 10 May 1996 08:49:56 -0500 From: Joe Greco Message-Id: <199605101349.IAA02313@brasil.moneng.mei.com> Subject: Re: termios'ed getty To: joerg_wunsch@uriah.heep.sax.de Date: Fri, 10 May 1996 08:49:55 -0500 (CDT) Cc: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.org In-Reply-To: <199605072129.XAA11587@uriah.heep.sax.de> from "J Wunsch" at May 7, 96 11:29:29 pm X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL24] Content-Type: text Sender: owner-current@FreeBSD.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk > Bruce reminded me of the ugliness of the V7/oldBSD <-> termios > conversion code, and of our huge previous problems with the kernel > equivalent of this. > > So now the US$ 4.99 question: what do people think about completely > ripping out support for the obsolete V7/oldBSD-style sgtty options in > getty? Does anybody know somebody who's really using all these > f0/f1/f2 flags in gettytab? Um. Um. (looks for a place to hide) Can I submit a plea of no contest? I've used them... eeeeccch, makes me wanna toss, mainly when I needed to do something I could do no other way. I think printcap uses the sgtty options too, doesn't it (xc/xs/fc)? > If nobody objects within reasonable time, i consider removing all the > compat cruft that's no longer needed. Pleeeeeease! :-) ... Joe ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Joe Greco - Systems Administrator jgreco@ns.sol.net Solaria Public Access UNIX - Milwaukee, WI 414/546-7968