From owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Mar 16 01:50:26 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EBA7016A4CE for ; Tue, 16 Mar 2004 01:50:26 -0800 (PST) Received: from smtp02.syd.iprimus.net.au (smtp02.syd.iprimus.net.au [210.50.76.52]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1982F43D1F for ; Tue, 16 Mar 2004 01:50:26 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from tim@robbins.dropbear.id.au) Received: from robbins.dropbear.id.au (203.134.130.100) by smtp02.syd.iprimus.net.au (7.0.024) id 402CF87000A1FBBB; Tue, 16 Mar 2004 20:50:24 +1100 Received: by robbins.dropbear.id.au (Postfix, from userid 1000) id F0967415D; Tue, 16 Mar 2004 20:51:12 +1100 (EST) Date: Tue, 16 Mar 2004 20:51:12 +1100 From: Tim Robbins To: Bosko Milekic Message-ID: <20040316095112.GA33276@cat.robbins.dropbear.id.au> References: <20040316032029.GA3735@technokratis.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20040316032029.GA3735@technokratis.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i cc: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Subject: Re: mbuma: network buffers & UMA X-BeenThere: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion related to FreeBSD architecture List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 16 Mar 2004 09:50:27 -0000 On Mon, Mar 15, 2004 at 10:20:29PM -0500, Bosko Milekic wrote: > The post below has received exactly zero attention on the > freebsd-current mailing list. I'm assuming this is because there are > other exciting threads going on there right now, such as style debates > and lovely feature requests. :-) > > I would like to commit this RSN. I need feedback from the Release > Engineering people on how close we are to a RELEASE and if it's OK for > me to break netstat -m stats for a few weeks or, if not, what the > appropriate course of action is. I'm unable to test this right now, but I like the idea of using UMA for mbuf allocations. I also like the keg allocator idea - it will be useful in quite a few other places. Tim