From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu May 5 21:06:54 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D427A106564A for ; Thu, 5 May 2011 21:06:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gull@gull.us) Received: from mail-ew0-f54.google.com (mail-ew0-f54.google.com [209.85.215.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6E1F48FC0A for ; Thu, 5 May 2011 21:06:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: by ewy1 with SMTP id 1so1031252ewy.13 for ; Thu, 05 May 2011 14:06:53 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.14.6.10 with SMTP id 10mr1365357eem.117.1304627722717; Thu, 05 May 2011 13:35:22 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.14.47.11 with HTTP; Thu, 5 May 2011 13:35:22 -0700 (PDT) X-Originating-IP: [173.250.142.186] In-Reply-To: References: <4DC1BEA8.6030108@gmail.com> <20110504224931.9ffd5682.dcdowse@gmx.net> <4DC1E23E.3020001@gmail.com> <20110505014556.50dcea0e.dcdowse@gmx.net> Date: Thu, 5 May 2011 13:35:22 -0700 Message-ID: From: David Brodbeck To: questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Cc: Subject: Re: rox-fm X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 05 May 2011 21:06:54 -0000 On Wed, May 4, 2011 at 7:50 PM, Alejandro Imass wrote: > I wish someone could clearly explain why the reply-to field should > ONLY have the mailing-list address, or at least have as the default > address and not the other way around as it is here! This is one of the all-time great religious wars of the internet, on par with vi vs. Emacs and top-posting vs. bottom-posting. See http://marc.merlins.org/netrants/reply-to-harmful.html for one side of the argument, and http://www.metasystema.net/essays/reply-to.html for the other side. My advice is to just accept that some mailing list administrators will choose one side of this particular schism, and others will choose the other. Arguing the issue rarely gets anywhere.