From owner-freebsd-questions Tue May 25 1:13:19 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from titan.metropolitan.at (mail.metropolitan.at [195.212.98.131]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4DE811543A for ; Tue, 25 May 1999 01:13:07 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from mladavac@metropolitan.at) Received: by TITAN with Internet Mail Service (5.0.1458.49) id ; Tue, 25 May 1999 10:15:54 +0200 Message-ID: <55586E7391ACD211B9730000C1100276179617@r-lmh-wi-100.corpnet.at> From: Ladavac Marino To: 'Prasad Tadi' , Alfred Perlstein , rivers@dignus.com Cc: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: RE: HP-UX to freeBSD 2.2.8 and 3.1 Date: Tue, 25 May 1999 10:10:54 +0200 X-Priority: 3 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.0.1458.49) Content-Type: text/plain Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG > -----Original Message----- > From: Prasad Tadi [SMTP:ptadi@roshitech.com] > Sent: Tuesday, May 25, 1999 2:24 AM > To: Alfred Perlstein; rivers@dignus.com > Cc: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG > Subject: Re: HP-UX to freeBSD 2.2.8 and 3.1 > > > They wan to use the system as they were using earlier. Just they login > to > HP_UX and do all the stuff. > Only Debugging was done on the Target machine. We use ClearCase and > Clearmake. It doesn't work on FreeBSD. > .-----End of background -------- [ML] We were in the same boat regarding SINIX and ClearCase. What was done was that the HP boxen were running cpp, and the .i files were rcopied to a SINIX box and compiled further there. We have had to turn off the DO wink-in features because copy back of a bunch of .o files was far too expensive. This worked for my FreeBSD box as well. Sorry, I cannot offer the scripts because they are at my previous employer's. BTW, we have also had a Solaris Ultra-1 box there and it outperformed the 4-CPU K-800 HP boxen by a sizeable margin doing pure cpp runs (the pizzabox had only 1 CPU and 394 Megs of RAM, vs. 4 CPU and a Gig. The pizzabox was serving as a XDM host with me on it as well, whereas the K800 was a dedicated cpp server. Go figure :) > Hence we said we will explore the possibility of this CrossCompilers. > We > gave the solution using the View Extended NFS mounts on to BSD system. > It > will continue, while we explore the CrossCompiler Issues. [ML] Forget the NFS mounts. Too instable. Tend to wedge after config-spec change. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message