From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Nov 19 08:04:11 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 20DB9599 for ; Wed, 19 Nov 2014 08:04:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: from the-host.seacom.mu (ge-1.ln-01-jnb.za.seacomnet.com [105.28.96.5]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 55812EAA for ; Wed, 19 Nov 2014 08:04:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=the-host.localnet) by the-host.seacom.mu with esmtp (Exim 4.80.1) (envelope-from ) id 1Xr0F3-0006LJ-IT for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Wed, 19 Nov 2014 10:03:57 +0200 From: Mark Tinka Reply-To: mark.tinka@seacom.mu Organization: SEACOM To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: freebsd-update - 10.0 to 10.1 Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2014 10:03:56 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.13.6 (Linux/2.6.37.6-24-desktop; KDE/4.6.0; i686; ; ) References: <201411170840.06373.mark.tinka@seacom.mu> <001301d0026f$878bdce0$96a396a0$@seibercom.net> <201411171626.05487.mark.tinka@seacom.mu> In-Reply-To: <201411171626.05487.mark.tinka@seacom.mu> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart1602917.hg5iGTAt0f"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <201411191003.56313.mark.tinka@seacom.mu> X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2014 08:04:11 -0000 --nextPart1602917.hg5iGTAt0f Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi all. So some feedback on this. I went ahead and ignored the message to rebuild all Ports.=20 No issues with that re: basic stability of the platform. However, there seems to be an issue with IPfw. After the=20 second "freebsd-update install" run, a reboot is=20 unsuccessful due to some issue with IPfw. The box just hangs=20 and does not reboot. A hard reboot is required to restart the box, and after that=20 all is well. I've tested this without turning off IPfw, and with turning=20 off IPfw prior to the upgrade, and the issue is the same.=20 Very strange. So this means that without some kind of iLO access to the=20 server, a reboot requires remote hands for remote sites. Not happy with this 10.1 upgrade :-(. Mark. --nextPart1602917.hg5iGTAt0f Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.16 (GNU/Linux) iQIcBAABAgAGBQJUbE7sAAoJEGcZuYTeKm+GPTMQAJJcU9YyK1oum6kTIs0quoxG Ox/Si50OXfH8YB6HtJi/52g9Xu+sM9AaEg2tlodgEm2vlYxi/jny4O40ZgB4ZOQm ZOlnrcqXlfA49ABG7Vb2cxjzQb58VIaKctF1Cdj0+P0StrmsLHvxJLHf+dLn2cfj UX50EmXlbXlYM8FgM5mDySJ4AbPI4Z4V1pBtAopcrXPAPIQ42ByY1HQDDcIpPIRh 36yNTd8Ln7CkPfnAPS+ziWY1XPdAMsHmcGlRmy7ZTay0xMSqhfURxMlJjE7QlUVY shsiL0dNvOMo7U40O6GvBPGBoFN97wUp+Jorz+h6YDj2V0VsyU2X29ddXihivz0f QBtHv+rDlKBI0gFWd/MrO9ZU9WLAOy5iFQuPuuuYmmceXEMQalhAjVcnBzhBBOQy t72gRP7X7Hn5hlM7RWc0CAOW3sFP9asx0kSsUFLHX+O1b5toHnTWHOu82ar/zP9l SLo8OPEctojg6p0KFPuIkc8ju9ihUwVkqKSIOh3zmWK+rD7o/wqqqnrkSf+dkiF1 CMTXfWBDKCmSbMP9aAZ+D5xwQULKKV7ZpIg9AJsW2SdJkhNdx2nPRiZs14lyUHLj by/XSfBFBv0fbemtTj6iPT5WHf/LkExXML9m/66bbTiFJz3O1sG9rFCpTVV4orU6 JQXPhgbBE9pTYDvQuSQj =xqPG -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart1602917.hg5iGTAt0f--