From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 17 20:33:22 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D55551065674 for ; Tue, 17 Jan 2012 20:33:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rsmith@xs4all.nl) Received: from smtp-vbr6.xs4all.nl (smtp-vbr6.xs4all.nl [194.109.24.26]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 69A6B8FC18 for ; Tue, 17 Jan 2012 20:33:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: from slackbox.erewhon.net (slackbox.xs4all.nl [213.84.242.160]) by smtp-vbr6.xs4all.nl (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id q0HKWnO1032404; Tue, 17 Jan 2012 21:32:50 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from rsmith@xs4all.nl) Received: by slackbox.erewhon.net (Postfix, from userid 1001) id B274A1235E; Tue, 17 Jan 2012 21:32:49 +0100 (CET) Date: Tue, 17 Jan 2012 21:32:49 +0100 From: Roland Smith To: "C. P. Ghost" Message-ID: <20120117203249.GA71452@slackbox.erewhon.net> References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="tKW2IUtsqtDRztdT" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-GPG-Fingerprint: 1A2B 477F 9970 BA3C 2914 B7CE 1277 EFB0 C321 A725 X-GPG-Key: http://www.xs4all.nl/~rsmith/pubkey.txt X-GPG-Notice: If this message is not signed, don't assume I sent it! User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-Virus-Scanned: by XS4ALL Virus Scanner Cc: FreeBSD Mailing List Subject: Re: Which Common Lisp port for FreeBSD/sparc64? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 17 Jan 2012 20:33:22 -0000 --tKW2IUtsqtDRztdT Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, Jan 17, 2012 at 01:07:23AM +0100, C. P. Ghost wrote: > Hi, >=20 > is anyone running a Common Lisp port on FreeBSD/sparc64? > I'm asking because none of our Common Lisp ports lang/clisp, > lang/ccl, lang/cmucl, lang/sbcl compile on sparc64. The first thing to check is to comment out the ONLY_FOR_ARCH stuff in the p= ort Makefile and see where the build fails. Sometimes a newer version starts working on a previously excluded architecture, and it takes a while for that to get noticed. If the build of your favorite lisp still fails, you'll have to dive into the source to see what's wrong. It might be something relatively easy to fix. S= ome familiarity with C is probably required, though. :-) > On Debian Linux 6.0.1a for SPARC, at least sbcl is available. > Maybe clisp as well, IIRC. In that case, check the patches that Debian uses on SPARC, and see if you c= an fix the FreeBSD port with those. Roland --=20 R.F.Smith http://www.xs4all.nl/~rsmith/ [plain text _non-HTML_ PGP/GnuPG encrypted/signed email much appreciated] pgp: 1A2B 477F 9970 BA3C 2914 B7CE 1277 EFB0 C321 A725 (KeyID: C321A725) --tKW2IUtsqtDRztdT Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.18 (FreeBSD) iEYEARECAAYFAk8V2vEACgkQEnfvsMMhpyUA6ACfcW6cz9xxzojTdjkntCq1zvFv qkcAnA3pBWibUgXnUhwZdGZUYfV4rTvj =4dwl -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --tKW2IUtsqtDRztdT--