Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sat, 28 Oct 2006 00:14:49 +0400
From:      Lev Serebryakov <lev@FreeBSD.org>
To:        Julian Elischer <julian@elischer.org>
Cc:        Lev Serebryakov <lev@FreeBSD.org>, Robert Watson <rwatson@FreeBSD.org>, current@FreeBSD.org
Subject:   Re[2]: KSE, libpthread & libthr: almost newbie question
Message-ID:  <602423478.20061028001449@serebryakov.spb.ru>
In-Reply-To: <45426071.7020403@elischer.org>
References:  <917908193.20061027102647@serebryakov.spb.ru> <20061027103924.F79313@fledge.watson.org> <45426071.7020403@elischer.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Hello Julian,

Friday, October 27, 2006, 11:39:29 PM, you wrote:

JE> As I mentioned in another email, most of the complexity does not come 
JE> from the  M:N code, but rather from the attempt to provide process 
JE> fairness.
  What is Process fairness? Situation, when process with 10 threads consumes same amount of CPU resource, as process with 1 thread (if they are equal in IO, sleeping, etc)?


-- 
Best regards,
 Lev                            mailto:lev@FreeBSD.org




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?602423478.20061028001449>