From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Dec 14 04:23:31 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BADE51065670 for ; Wed, 14 Dec 2011 04:23:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from crodr001@gmail.com) Received: from mail-ey0-f182.google.com (mail-ey0-f182.google.com [209.85.215.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 284A88FC12 for ; Wed, 14 Dec 2011 04:23:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: by eaaf13 with SMTP id f13so493638eaa.13 for ; Tue, 13 Dec 2011 20:23:30 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=bziLRLHCFmrgJXPUnjlitUU05qG6DRyw/7BkIh+HVsU=; b=rH8axEXbpjmOlVyYl7tXC8a9Y2AMmlwpfwo0DkZAZNq4o8tVP76cQSyoy2Hpnh9QT8 pBYPnTDnVQ8c7kYBJNmzC67FC0KWEt/0lMAcChYI9UpJBY7GU2siH9R6Yf82PEkdFyuR GIM9NY0i8QrnxcdeSIMdczfGkNBDFKvA+85F8= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.205.120.14 with SMTP id fw14mr181273bkc.53.1323836610006; Tue, 13 Dec 2011 20:23:30 -0800 (PST) Sender: crodr001@gmail.com Received: by 10.205.115.138 with HTTP; Tue, 13 Dec 2011 20:23:29 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <4EE70514.1040907@FreeBSD.org> References: <465660264.237830.1322071102401.JavaMail.root@erie.cs.uoguelph.ca> <1322072781.12047.4.camel@hitfishpass-lx.corp.yahoo.com> <4EE70514.1040907@FreeBSD.org> Date: Tue, 13 Dec 2011 20:23:29 -0800 X-Google-Sender-Auth: QfnnTY7pcU_2A0GI1E7YVbVchko Message-ID: From: Craig Rodrigues To: Dimitry Andric Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Cc: FreeBSD-Current , Sean Bruno , Rick Macklem Subject: Re: NFS + SVN problem? X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 14 Dec 2011 04:23:31 -0000 On Mon, Dec 12, 2011 at 11:56 PM, Dimitry Andric wrote: > > A very late addition to this: I got Subversion 1.7 to work properly over > NFSv3, by making sure rpc.lockd runs on both server and client. > > E.g, set rpc_lockd_enable to YES in rc.conf; this is off by default, > even if you have nfs_client_enable/nfs_server_enable set to YES. > _______________________________________________ If nfs_client_enable or nfs_server_enable are set to YES, does is it reasonable to have rpc_lockd_enable default to YES, unless the user explicitly sets it to NO in their /etc/rc.conf? -- Craig Rodrigues rodrigc@crodrigues.org