From owner-freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Mar 16 22:12:09 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B0C7E1065674 for ; Sun, 16 Mar 2008 22:12:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from beech@freebsd.org) Received: from freebsd.alaskaparadise.com (freebsd.alaskaparadise.com [208.79.80.117]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7B90E8FC18 for ; Sun, 16 Mar 2008 22:12:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from beech@freebsd.org) Received: from 137-42-178-69.gci.net (137-42-178-69.gci.net [69.178.42.137]) by freebsd.alaskaparadise.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D52D223832F9; Sun, 16 Mar 2008 22:12:08 +0000 (UTC) From: Beech Rintoul To: Mark Linimon Date: Sun, 16 Mar 2008 13:11:59 -0900 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.7 References: <20080315080424.13561oymhrersh8g@intranet.encontacto.net> <19543989_-_@ipt.ru> <20080316151235.GA19467@soaustin.net> In-Reply-To: <20080316151235.GA19467@soaustin.net> X-Face: jC2w\k*Q1\0DA2Q0Eh&BrP/Rt2M,^2O#R07VoT98m*>miQF9%Bi9vy`F6cPjwEe?m,)=?utf-8?q?2=0A=09X=3FM=5C=3AOE9QgZ?="xT3/n3,3MJ7N=Cfkmi%f(w^~X"SUxn>; 27NO; C+)g[7J`$G*SN>{<=?utf-8?q?O=3Bg7=7C=0A=09o=7D=265A=5D4?=@7D`=Eb@Zs1Ln814?]|k@'bG=.Ca"[|8+_.OsNAo8!#?4u MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200803161412.05267.beech@freebsd.org> Cc: Alexander Leidinger , freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org Subject: Re: linux_dri at amd64 (was: Re: What is the recommended LinuxEmulator and kernel that will run skype-devel and maybe Flash9) X-BeenThere: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Beech Rintoul List-Id: Development of Emulators of other operating systems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 16 Mar 2008 22:12:09 -0000 On Sunday 16 March 2008, Mark Linimon said: > On Sun, Mar 16, 2008 at 04:28:42PM +0300, Boris Samorodov wrote: > > Seems that the case is not so strict: > > http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=ports/91318 > > OK, the email thread that led to the current state of this PR is > what I am remembering, under the vague label of "we will need > someone to track this when we flip it over". > > It will be instructive to look at the graphics/linux_dri row in > http://portsmon.freebsd.org/chartsandgraphs/package_failures_list.a >md64-6.html. > > I'm not objecting to flipping the ARCH as long as someone takes a > look at the dependents and does TRT with them. It sounds like we > already have volunteers :-) > > mcl In going through the depend list, and grepping the tree it looks to me like there are @20 ports affected, one of which is marked broken for other reasons and two which are mine. Unless there's ports which aren't already flagged, I don't see any serious breakage happening. Alexander mentioned to check for linux errors. dyeske has been stress testing skype and there are none. So what's next? Maybe a heads-up on ports@ and I'm willing to ping the individual maintainers and track any breakage. BTW, I posted a list of dependent ports on my wiki: http://freebsd.alaskaparadise.com/wiki/tiki-index.php?page=LinuxDriAmd64 Beech -- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Beech Rintoul - FreeBSD Developer - beech@FreeBSD.org /"\ ASCII Ribbon Campaign | FreeBSD Since 4.x \ / - NO HTML/RTF in e-mail | http://www.freebsd.org X - NO Word docs in e-mail | Latest Release: / \ - http://www.FreeBSD.org/releases/7.0R/announce.html ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------