From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Mar 5 08:43:58 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1DD7A16A4CE; Fri, 5 Mar 2004 08:43:58 -0800 (PST) Received: from hak.cnd.mcgill.ca (hak.cnd.mcgill.ca [132.216.11.133]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B165643D31; Fri, 5 Mar 2004 08:43:57 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from mat@hak.cnd.mcgill.ca) Received: from hak.cnd.mcgill.ca (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by hak.cnd.mcgill.ca (8.12.9/8.12.8) with ESMTP id i25GjmCR043463; Fri, 5 Mar 2004 11:45:48 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from mat@hak.cnd.mcgill.ca) Received: (from mat@localhost) by hak.cnd.mcgill.ca (8.12.9/8.12.8/Submit) id i25Gjmqa043462; Fri, 5 Mar 2004 11:45:48 -0500 (EST) Date: Fri, 5 Mar 2004 11:45:48 -0500 From: Mathew Kanner To: Helge Oldach Message-ID: <20040305164548.GD35653@cnd.mcgill.ca> References: <20040305141757.GC35653@cnd.mcgill.ca> <200403051633.RAA12241@galaxy.hbg.de.ao-srv.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200403051633.RAA12241@galaxy.hbg.de.ao-srv.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i Organization: I speak for myself, operating in Montreal, CANADA X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.62 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.62 (2004-01-11) on hak.cnd.mcgill.ca cc: stable@freebsd.org cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org cc: rwatson@freebsd.org cc: jorn@wcborstel.nl cc: rpratt1950@earthlink.net cc: Mathew Kanner Subject: Re: Standard sbc and pcm support in GENERIC kernel? X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 05 Mar 2004 16:43:58 -0000 [...Just noticed that we are posting to multiple groups. Sorry everyone, though I not ready to drop them...] On Mar 05, Helge Oldach wrote: > Mathew Kanner: > >On Mar 05, Helge Oldach wrote: > > Yes, that is exactly correct. I am sorry, I just wasn't clear enough > with my wording. To be safe, I just tested it: > > case a) "options PNPBIOS" and "device pcm" in the kernel config => works > > case b) "options PNPBIOS" in the kernel config and "kldload snd_pcm" => > pcm isn't recognized, but the other PnP devices show up during probe > > case c) *no* "options PNPBIOS" but "kldload snd_pcm" => neither pcm nor > other PnP devices are recognized > > Did I forget one variation? :-) Helge, kldloading snd_pcm isn't enough. You need to load the driver for your particular card (the module dependacies should load snd_pcm for you). I think you are going to have to retry your tests. --Mat -- We peer so suspiciously at each other that we cannot see that we Canadians are standing on the mountaintop of human wealth, freedom and privilege. - Pierre Elliott Trudeau