From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG  Wed Feb 18 10:27:00 2004
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0FE0C16A4CE
	for <ports@freebsd.org>; Wed, 18 Feb 2004 10:27:00 -0800 (PST)
Received: from lakemtao07.cox.net (lakemtao07.cox.net [68.1.17.114])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 90D6643D1F
	for <ports@freebsd.org>; Wed, 18 Feb 2004 10:26:59 -0800 (PST)
	(envelope-from mezz7@cox.net)
Received: from mezz.mezzweb.com ([68.103.32.11]) by lakemtao07.cox.net
          (InterMail vM.5.01.06.05 201-253-122-130-105-20030824) with ESMTP
          id <20040218182659.XUVV2432.lakemtao07.cox.net@mezz.mezzweb.com>;
          Wed, 18 Feb 2004 13:26:59 -0500
To: Adam McLaurin <adam.mclaurin@gmx.net>
References: <20040218062743.GT53771@toxic.magnesium.net>
	<20040218031502.024ecbd6.adam.mclaurin@gmx.net>
Message-ID: <opr3kv5bjg8ckrg5@smtp.central.cox.net>
From: Jeremy Messenger <mezz7@cox.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset=iso-8859-1
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2004 12:25:49 -0600
In-Reply-To: <20040218031502.024ecbd6.adam.mclaurin@gmx.net>
User-Agent: Opera7.23/Linux M2 build 518
cc: ports@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: www/flashpluginwrapper
X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD <freebsd-ports.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports>,
	<mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports>,
	<mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2004 18:27:00 -0000

On Wed, 18 Feb 2004 03:15:02 -0500, Adam McLaurin <adam.mclaurin@gmx.net> 
wrote:

> On 18 Feb 2004 01:27:43 -0500
> Adam Weinberger <adamw@magnesium.net> wrote:
>
>> Please reconsider removing flashpluginwrapper. I find it ludicrous
>> that
>> I should have to manually apply a patch every time I want to update my
>> system. As flashpluginwrapper works, there is no harm in allowing it
>> to
>> remain in the tree until such time as -STABLE actually support
>> linuxpluginwrapper.
>>
>> This port is not deprecated. It is still of use to those of us who
>> don't
>> wish to be manually applying patches to src all the time.
>>
>> # Adam
>
> Hmmm, who wants to remove it? I think many people are still using it
> (myself included)!
>
> I second Adam's plea; don't remove it!

I agree about to not remove it if this port is still function and work. If 
it's broke and nobody can fix it, then it's ok to remove it.

Cheers,
Mezz


-- 
bsdforums.org 's moderator, mezz.