From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Thu Mar 16 02:33:20 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F3BA2D0E8B5 for ; Thu, 16 Mar 2017 02:33:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kristof@sigsegv.be) Received: from venus.codepro.be (venus.codepro.be [IPv6:2a01:4f8:162:1127::2]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "*.codepro.be", Issuer "Gandi Standard SSL CA 2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BBF0617B4 for ; Thu, 16 Mar 2017 02:33:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kristof@sigsegv.be) Received: from [192.168.8.218] (203.141.139.231.static.zoot.jp [203.141.139.231]) (Authenticated sender: kp) by venus.codepro.be (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 3A9001E10A; Thu, 16 Mar 2017 03:33:14 +0100 (CET) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=sigsegv.be; s=mail; t=1489631596; bh=L3GzeFnTNyFXNknwdv0vPJI0K319WwmbpeVqCscaNb0=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References; b=moiKbQI56uxZ7xkZComfpkH5V7blzpAS+IgCli5B3IPsGMYSnDhHgxwl2zGX6xJ00 ekYAwsLnCOD8+a/OESAlizfqM6SJZtIcKM/TizWjbRWeFvOQ0dmUCun80Hq405zPv2 dYdIlEW74dTHJmopKWF1dfkqkXkYD4GFOtvg9Yac= From: "Kristof Provost" To: "Mike Tancsa" Cc: "freebsd-net@freebsd.org" Subject: Re: pf bug with tun interfaces ? Date: Thu, 16 Mar 2017 11:33:14 +0900 Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <6582cf37-08b0-9083-0c3e-1396a885d005@sentex.net> References: <1b605589-9642-ee92-fb9b-9ff5b4798316@sentex.net> <6582cf37-08b0-9083-0c3e-1396a885d005@sentex.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Mailer: MailMate (2.0BETAr6080) X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 16 Mar 2017 02:33:20 -0000 On 15 Mar 2017, at 22:10, Mike Tancsa wrote: > On 3/15/2017 4:28 AM, Kristof Provost wrote: >> I don’t see any obvious reason why that would happen. >> >> Can you reduce this to a minimal test setup and include rc.conf, >> pf.conf, … >> with a bug report in bugzilla? > > is it possible that its how OpenVPN sets up the tun interface ? > Otherwise nat via pf on ppp connections would not work either. > I’m not aware of anything, but I’m not very familiar with OpenVPN. Regards, Kristof