Date: Thu, 16 Mar 2017 11:33:14 +0900 From: "Kristof Provost" <kristof@sigsegv.be> To: "Mike Tancsa" <mike@sentex.net> Cc: "freebsd-net@freebsd.org" <freebsd-net@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: pf bug with tun interfaces ? Message-ID: <CD5336F5-4146-4F2E-A92C-D74717979A92@sigsegv.be> In-Reply-To: <6582cf37-08b0-9083-0c3e-1396a885d005@sentex.net> References: <1b605589-9642-ee92-fb9b-9ff5b4798316@sentex.net> <e1679f63-247c-1da6-8f57-30c5dd23304e@sentex.net> <AD6E6EB9-9FD8-4B9C-B401-2D750F17FA40@sigsegv.be> <6582cf37-08b0-9083-0c3e-1396a885d005@sentex.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 15 Mar 2017, at 22:10, Mike Tancsa wrote: > On 3/15/2017 4:28 AM, Kristof Provost wrote: >> I don’t see any obvious reason why that would happen. >> >> Can you reduce this to a minimal test setup and include rc.conf, >> pf.conf, … >> with a bug report in bugzilla? > > is it possible that its how OpenVPN sets up the tun interface ? > Otherwise nat via pf on ppp connections would not work either. > I’m not aware of anything, but I’m not very familiar with OpenVPN. Regards, Kristof
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CD5336F5-4146-4F2E-A92C-D74717979A92>