From owner-freebsd-hackers Sat Jun 1 9:37:44 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from elvis.mu.org (elvis.mu.org [192.203.228.196]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 89EE737B40A for ; Sat, 1 Jun 2002 09:37:39 -0700 (PDT) Received: by elvis.mu.org (Postfix, from userid 1192) id 6168EAE1C1; Sat, 1 Jun 2002 09:37:39 -0700 (PDT) Date: Sat, 1 Jun 2002 09:37:39 -0700 From: Alfred Perlstein To: hiten@uk.FreeBSD.org Cc: freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: GFP_NOFS alternative/information for FreeBSD Kernel Malloc Message-ID: <20020601163739.GI17045@elvis.mu.org> References: <20020601163528.28107.qmail@web21104.mail.yahoo.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20020601163528.28107.qmail@web21104.mail.yahoo.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.27i Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG * Hiten Pandya [020601 09:35] wrote: > > As of now, I have changed this to just use M_WAITOK and malloc() call, but > I was wondering if anyone can guide me on this GFP_NOFS alternative. Also, > Alfred to told me on IRC to just #define M_NOFS 0 for now, and then worry > about it later. Which is what you should do. What was the point of asking me if you weren't going to take my advice? *sigh* -- -Alfred Perlstein [alfred@freebsd.org] 'Instead of asking why a piece of software is using "1970s technology," start asking why software is ignoring 30 years of accumulated wisdom.' Tax deductible donations for FreeBSD: http://www.freebsdfoundation.org/ To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message