From owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Oct 6 00:30:37 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: cvs-all@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9947B16A4B3; Mon, 6 Oct 2003 00:30:37 -0700 (PDT) Received: from arginine.spc.org (arginine.spc.org [195.206.69.236]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E452E43FBF; Mon, 6 Oct 2003 00:30:35 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from bms@spc.org) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by arginine.spc.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 16D6E65501; Mon, 6 Oct 2003 08:30:34 +0100 (BST) Received: from arginine.spc.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (arginine.spc.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 27951-02; Mon, 6 Oct 2003 08:30:33 +0100 (BST) Received: from saboteur.dek.spc.org (unknown [81.3.72.68]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by arginine.spc.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6CBA5654F1; Mon, 6 Oct 2003 08:30:33 +0100 (BST) Received: by saboteur.dek.spc.org (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 0D92915; Mon, 6 Oct 2003 08:30:24 +0100 (BST) Date: Mon, 6 Oct 2003 08:30:23 +0100 From: Bruce M Simpson To: Warner Losh Message-ID: <20031006073023.GA7994@saboteur.dek.spc.org> Mail-Followup-To: Warner Losh , src-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-src@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org References: <200310060710.h967AeMv095458@repoman.freebsd.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200310060710.h967AeMv095458@repoman.freebsd.org> cc: cvs-src@FreeBSD.org cc: src-committers@FreeBSD.org cc: cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sys/dev/pccard card_if.m X-BeenThere: cvs-all@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: CVS commit messages for the entire tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 06 Oct 2003 07:30:37 -0000 On Mon, Oct 06, 2003 at 12:10:40AM -0700, Warner Losh wrote: > Log: > Remove the cis reading bus methods. They were never implemented and > there's been some critism about the API not being lock friendly. Looks like I'll need to rethink the pcmem attach, but we agreed that some code would be needed within pccard to handle the 'I have no CIS' case for memory cards anyway; I'm glad things are now simpler and cleaner. Do you have any objection to using ivars instead? BMS