From owner-freebsd-ports  Sat Aug  1 02:30:06 1998
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG>
Received: (from majordom@localhost)
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id CAA23418
          for freebsd-ports-outgoing; Sat, 1 Aug 1998 02:30:06 -0700 (PDT)
          (envelope-from owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG)
Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.FreeBSD.ORG [204.216.27.21])
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id CAA23359
          for <freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org>; Sat, 1 Aug 1998 02:30:01 -0700 (PDT)
          (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org)
Received: (from gnats@localhost)
	by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.5) id CAA27348;
	Sat, 1 Aug 1998 02:30:01 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Sat, 1 Aug 1998 02:30:01 -0700 (PDT)
Message-Id: <199808010930.CAA27348@freefall.freebsd.org>
To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG
From: Dom Mitchell <dom@myrddin.demon.co.uk>
Subject: Re: ports/7451: `sc' port
Reply-To: Dom Mitchell <dom@myrddin.demon.co.uk>
Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org

The following reply was made to PR ports/7451; it has been noted by GNATS.

From: Dom Mitchell <dom@myrddin.demon.co.uk>
To: Heinz Tschabitscher <semper@doubt.com>
Cc: FreeBSD-gnats-submit@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: ports/7451: `sc' port
Date: Sat, 01 Aug 1998 10:00:49 +0100

 Heinz Tschabitscher <semper@doubt.com> writes:
 
 Have you considered looking at the color version of sc, by John Davis?
 
 It's on space.mit.edu:/pub/davis/
 
 It does depend on SLANG though (by the same author).
 
 > >Number:         7451
 > >Category:       ports
 > >Synopsis:       `sc' port
 > >Confidential:   no
 > >Severity:       non-critical
 > >Priority:       low
 > >Responsible:    freebsd-ports
 > >State:          open
 > >Quarter:
 > >Keywords:
 > >Date-Required:
 > >Class:          change-request
 > >Submitter-Id:   current-users
 > >Arrival-Date:   Thu Jul 30 12:50:01 PDT 1998
 > >Last-Modified:
 > >Originator:     Heinz Tschabitscher
 > >Organization:
 > The Mining Co.
 > >Release:        FreeBSD 2.2.7-RELEASE i386
 > >Environment:
 > 
 > >Description:
 >   I merely found a port of `ss' which, due to its user interface
 >   improvements, is considerably harder and slower to use than the
 >   `original' (in any sense) `sc'. Still it's strange (odd? interesting?)
 >   sc hasn't been compiled before...?
 
 -- 
 ``If make doesn't do what you expect it to, it's a good chance the
   makefile is wrong.'' -- Adam de Boor

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message