Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 14 Jan 1997 19:37:34 -0500
From:      Joel Ray Holveck <joelh@gnu.ai.mit.edu>
To:        joerg_wunsch@uriah.heep.sax.de
Cc:        freebsd-chat@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: Partition naming [Was: Adding Hard Drives - Prepping]
Message-ID:  <199701150037.TAA09401@kropotkin.gnu.ai.mit.edu>
In-Reply-To: <Mutt.19970114093948.j@uriah.heep.sax.de>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
 >>> Ok, i've realized that we ``only'' support 30 slices either.
 >> Per partition?
 > No.  You're confusing terms. :-)

Actually, I was thinking of Solaris x86, in which the term `partition'
is used in the x86 tradition of the stuff recorded at the beginning of
the HDD and edited with `fdisk' and its ilk.  (/dev/hd0[a-d])  Then it
slices that up (/dev/hd0[a-d][0-9]+) and those slices are what go into
your mount table.

 > We support 7 partitions each inside the 30 slices.  See the
 > subject. ;-)

You mean those headers serve a purpose besides sendmail holes?

-- 
http://www.wp.com/piquan --- Joel Ray Holveck --- joelh@gnu.ai.mit.edu
All my opinions are my own, not the FSF's, my employer's, or my dog's.

Fourth law of computing:
  Anything that can go wro
.signature: segmentation violation -- core dumped



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199701150037.TAA09401>