From owner-freebsd-hackers  Wed Jan  8 21:04:36 1997
Return-Path: <owner-hackers>
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.4/8.8.4) id VAA00717
          for hackers-outgoing; Wed, 8 Jan 1997 21:04:36 -0800 (PST)
Received: from crh.cl.msu.edu (crh.cl.msu.edu [35.8.1.24])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.4/8.8.4) with ESMTP id VAA00700
          for <freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org>; Wed, 8 Jan 1997 21:04:33 -0800 (PST)
Received: (from henrich@localhost)
          by crh.cl.msu.edu (8.8.4/8.8.4)
	  id AAA06512; Thu, 9 Jan 1997 00:04:26 -0500 (EST)
From: Charles Henrich <henrich@crh.cl.msu.edu>
Message-Id: <199701090504.AAA06512@crh.cl.msu.edu>
Subject: Re: is time() valid in kernel?
To: louie@TransSys.COM (Louis A. Mamakos)
Date: Thu, 9 Jan 1997 00:04:25 -0500 (EST)
Cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org
In-Reply-To: <199701090502.AAA08448@whizzo.transsys.com> from "Louis A. Mamakos" at "Jan 9, 97 00:02:15 am"
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL22 (25)]
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: owner-hackers@freebsd.org
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

> I think that you want to use microtime() to capture the current time
> whilst timestamping events in the kernel.  There's some code that I
> submitted a while ago which timestamps messages queued to UDP sockets
> based on a socket option; take a look at /sys/netinet/udp_usrreq.c
> for the code.

Cool, thanks much!

-Crh

       Charles Henrich     Michigan State University     henrich@msu.edu

                         http://pilot.msu.edu/~henrich