From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Oct 1 22:48:15 2007 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E4A2016A417 for ; Mon, 1 Oct 2007 22:48:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lists-fbsd@shadypond.com) Received: from mx-outbound01.easydns.com (mailout.easydns.com [205.210.42.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D414C13C45A for ; Mon, 1 Oct 2007 22:48:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lists-fbsd@shadypond.com) Received: from slider.shadypond.com (69-12-173-117.static.humboldt1.com [69.12.173.117]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx-outbound01.easydns.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 92DAD80BF for ; Mon, 1 Oct 2007 18:48:13 -0400 (EDT) Received: from slider.shadypond.com (slider.shadypond.com [192.168.1.11]) by slider.shadypond.com (postoffice) with ESMTP id 48DC9B65AD for ; Mon, 1 Oct 2007 22:48:10 +0000 (UTC) From: Pollywog To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Mon, 1 Oct 2007 22:48:09 +0000 References: <4700052A.7050008@gracenpeace.net> <20071001155353.F1106@bravo.pjkh.com> In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200710012248.09603.lists-fbsd@shadypond.com> Subject: Re: best spam filter port(s) for postfix? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 01 Oct 2007 22:48:16 -0000 On Monday 01 October 2007 22:18:00 Chuck Swiger wrote: > On Oct 1, 2007, at 6:54 PM, Philip Hallstrom wrote: > >> By far the best anti-spam tool I've used with Postfix is policyd- > >> weight. > >> mail/postfix-policyd-weight > > > > Agreed. +1. Me too. > > Seconded (or thirded :). > > policyd-weight is much smaller than amavisd-new or SpamAssassin (it > tends to run a couple of ~7 MB RSIZE processes, rather than a bunch > of 45 - 80MB RSIZE), and it's caching of RBL/DNSBL lookups means it > can handle and offload a bunch of queries that the others would do. I didn't know about this one. Is the installation and use documented somewhere? (In case I can't find anything on Google).