Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Thu, 17 Jan 2008 10:20:09 -0500
From:      Bill Moran <wmoran@potentialtech.com>
To:        Vladimir Zorin <vladimir@braveduck.spb.ru>
Cc:        freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: bsd.php.mk suggestion
Message-ID:  <20080117102009.6ba3233a.wmoran@potentialtech.com>
In-Reply-To: <478F6BC6.8030507@braveduck.spb.ru>
References:  <478F1FED.803@peterhost.ru> <478F5F83.3060508@gmx.de> <20080117094252.27243aee.wmoran@potentialtech.com> <478F6BC6.8030507@braveduck.spb.ru>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In response to Vladimir Zorin <vladimir@braveduck.spb.ru>:

> Bill Moran wrote:
> > In response to Dominic Fandrey <LoN_Kamikaze@gmx.de>:
> > 
> >> Vladimir Zorin wrote:
> >>> I tried to get in touch with Alex Dupre, the maintainer of the
> >>> bsd.php.mk, sent him the same text as the above with the patch, but I
> >>> didn't get any response. As far as I know there are several people who
> >>> tried to contact him regarding the same issue but, alas, didn't get any
> >>> response as well.
> >> I suppose there might be the possibility of a timeout that allows committing
> >> without Maintainer feedback, if you submit it as a PR.
> > 
> > This is exactly the way to proceed.
> > 
> > If the maintainer is not responding, open the issue as a PR so it's
> > officially tracked.  If the maintainer does not respond withing a
> > reasonable length of time, request a maintainer timeout to have another
> > committer check in the patch.
> 
> Thank you for the tip, I'll do the way you described. What regards 
> "reasonable length of time" - a fortnight, for example, is reasonable 
> enough?

There is an actual documented policy on this:
http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/porters-handbook/makefile-maintainer.html

-- 
Bill Moran
http://www.potentialtech.com



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20080117102009.6ba3233a.wmoran>